Internal Control Deficiencies and Conservative and Opportunist Accounting Choices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2019v22n3a4Keywords:
Internal Control Deficiencies, Audit Committee, Accounting Conservatism, Opportunistic Accounting Choices.Abstract
Objective: To analyze the influence of internal control deficiencies on conservative and opportunistic accounting choices.
Method: Objective description, documentary procedures and quantitative approach to the problem. The sample consisted of 63 to 77 companies with unbalanced data for each year from 2010 to 2015, which had an audit committee, as well as other information necessary for this analysis. The main analysis was carried out based on panel data regression using STATA software.
Originality/relevance: It presents as relevant in the current study the measurement and analysis of internal control deficiencies, since little has been discussed in national surveys, mainly due to the difficulty of measurement.
Results: The results showed that the company’s internal environment when it presented deficiencies did not impact on differentiated conservative accounting choices, but significantly influenced in the increase of the level of management to reduce the result. In addition, it was found that the control variables size of the company and profitability of the asset influenced in the reduction of the level of management in order to increase the result, which evidences the company's choice to reduce political costs.
Theoretical and methodological contributions: As a contribution of the study, it is clear that in a weak internal control environment, even if the company has an audit committee, there may be an increase in the level of management earnings, which impairs the quality of accounting information.
Downloads
References
Almeida, J.E.F. (2010). Qualidade da informação contábil em ambientes competitivos. 2010. Tese de Doutorado em Controladoria e Contabilidade. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney Jr, W. R., & LaFond, R. (2008). The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 217-250. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217
Banker, R. D., Basu, S., Byzalov, D., & Chen, J. Y. (2016). The confounding effect of cost stickiness on conservatism estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.07.001
Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings 1. Journal of accounting and economics, 24(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
Bryan, S. H., & Lilien, S. B. (2005). Characteristics of firms with material weaknesses in internal control: An assessment of Section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley. Recuperado em 01 fevereiro de 2017: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=682363. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.682363
Chan, K. C., Farrell, B. R., & Lee, P. (2005). Earnings management and return-earnings association of firms reporting material internal control weaknesses under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Recuperado em 01 de fevereiro de 2017: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=744806
Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis (2011) - Estrutura Conceitual para Elaboração e Divulgação de Relatório Contábil-Financeiro. Recuperado em: http://static.cpc.mediagroup.co m .br/Documentos/147_CPC00_R1.pdf
CPC 00. Estrutura Conceitual para Elaboração e Divulgação de Relatório Contábil-Financeiro. Acessado em 24 de julho de 2019, em http://static.cpc.aatb.com.br/Documentos/147_CPC00_R1.pdf
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting review, 193-225.
Doyle, J. T., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007). Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 82(5), 1141-1170. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1141
Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1), 255-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2, Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. Norwalk, CT: FASB, 1980.
Francis, J. (2001). Discussion of empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00017-9
Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2005). The disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Accounting Horizons, 19(3), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2005.19.3.137
Goh, B. W., & Li, D. (2011). Internal controls and conditional conservatism. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 975-1005. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000041
Hogan, C. E., & Wilkins, M. S. (2008). Evidence on the audit risk model: Do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.9
Hu, J., Li, A. Y., & Zhang, F. F. (2014). Does accounting conservatism improve the corporate information environment?. Journal of international accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.02.003
Ji, X., Lu, W., & Qu, W. (2016). Internal control weakness and accounting conservatism in China. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(6/7), 688-726. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2015-1234
Jiang, W., Rupley, K. H., & Wu, J. (2010). Internal control deficiencies and the issuance of going concern opinions. Research in Accounting Regulation, 22(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2009.11.002
Jiraporn, P., Miller, G. A., Yoon, S. S., & Kim, Y. S. (2008). Is earnings management opportunistic or beneficial? An agency theory perspective. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(3), 622-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2006.10.005
Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of accounting research, 193-228. DOI: 10.2307/2491047
Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The accounting review, 80(2), 649-675. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649
Paulo, E. (2007). Manipulação das informações contábeis: Uma análise teórica e empírica sobre os modelos operacionais de detecção de gerenciamento de resultados. Tese de Doutorado em Contabilidade. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Silva, A., Da Cunha, P. R., & Teixeira, S. A. (2018). Recomendações aos comitês de auditoria em empresas brasileiras. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 12, e138529-e138529.
Teixeira, S. A. (2015). Efeito Moderador das deficiências do controle interno na relação entre seus determinantes e consequentes. Tese de Doutorado em Ciências Contábeis e Administração. Universidade Regional de Blumenau. Blumenau. Santa Catarina, Brasil.
Warfield, T. D.; Wild, J. J. & Wild, K. L. (1995). Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of accounting and economics, 20 (1), 61-91.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: a ten year perspective. Accounting review, 131-156.
Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., & Zhou, N. (2007). Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of accounting and public policy, 26(3), 300-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.03.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors hold the copyright to their article and grant the Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance the exclusive rights of first publication (including communication to the public and reproduction), with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC).
This license allows third parties to remodel, adapt, and create from the published work, as long as it is for non-commercial purposes, giving due credit for authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to enter into additional separate agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publish a translation, or publish a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided there is no commercial use/distribution.
