Inhibitors Mechanisms of Group and Individuals Dishonesty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2019v22n2a4Palabras clave:
Dishonesty, Experiment, Control Mechanisms, Groups, Behavioral Finance.Resumen
Objective: the purpose of this study is to present how the insertion of control mechanisms, such as auditing and professional ethical standards, would influence the dishonest behavior of individuals in particular, and within a group.
Method: an experiment was performed with 204 participants in whom they would watch a die-rolling game and report the number shown by the dice. Nevertheless, the payment was tied to the number they reported and not to the number seen, thus making them dishonest.
Originality/Relevance: it is the first study in Brazil that seeks to verify components of collective dishonesty: previous works only analyzed individual dishonesty. In addition, both nationally and internationally, it is the first research in which mechanisms that are capable of inhibiting collective dishonesty are analyzed.
Results: it was possible to verify that the audit and the reading of some articles of the Professional Code of Ethics of the Accountant made the participants less dishonest: when the individuals were not subject to any control mechanism, 27% of the participants were dishonest; On the other hand, when they were subject to an audit process or after reading the PCEA articles, the percentage of dishonest ones was 9%.
Theoretical/Methodological Constraints: in the experiment it was possible to corroborate the hypothesis of the research: the control mechanisms presented (audit and reading articles in the PCEA) resulted in more honest decisions.
Social/Management Contributions: this work puts into question the research on dishonesty, not only its ethical and moral aspects, but also its financial impacts.
Descargas
Citas
Abeler, J., Becker, A., & Falk, A. (2014). Representative evidence on lying costs. Journal of Public Economics, 113, 96-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.005
Ariely, D. (2012). A mais pura verdade sobre a desonestidade. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Aveyard, M. E. (2014). A call to honesty: Extending religious priming of moral behavior to Middle Eastern Muslims. PloS One, 9(7), e99447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099447
Azar, O. H., Yosef, S., & Bar-Eli, M. (2013). Do customers return excessive change in a restaurant?: A field experiment on dishonesty. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 219-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e639302013-001
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In The economic dimensions of crime (pp. 13-68). Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62853-7_2
Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 385-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261880
Bénabou, R. (2012). Groupthink: Collective delusions in organizations and markets. Review of Economic Studies, 80(2), 429-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w14764
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1652-1678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11535
Bucciol, A., & Piovesan, M. (2011). Luck or cheating? A field experiment on honesty with children. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 73-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1307694
Camargo, M. (2008). Fundamentos de ética geral e profissional. 7 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.
Castillo, M., Petrie, R., Torero, M., & Viceisza, A. (2014). Lost in the mail: a field experiment on crime. Economic Inquiry, 52(1), 285-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736173
Charness, G., & Sutter, M. (2012). Groups make better self-interested decisions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 157-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.3.157
Chauí, M. (2002). A existência ética. In: Convite à Filosofia. 12 ed. São Paulo: Ática.
Conrads, J., Irlenbusch, B., Rilke, R. M., & Walkowitz, G. (2013). Lying and team incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.10.011
Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12014
Franzen, A., & Pointner, S. (2013). The external validity of giving in the dictator game. Experimental Economics, 16(2), 155-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-012-9337-5
Erat, S., & Gneezy, U. (2012). White lies. Management Science, 58(4), 723-733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1807406.1807464
Ganassin, Eduardo Jezini Fernandes. (2016). Investigação de variáveis que influenciam a ética profissional contábil: uma aplicação das teorias dos estímulos internos e externos. 2016. 81 f. Dissertation (Master Degree in Accounting) – Programa Multiinstitucional e Inter-Regional de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Contábeis da Universidade de Brasília, Universidade Federal da Paraíba e Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte.
Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 285-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.005
Gravert, C. (2013). How luck and performance affect stealing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 301-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.026
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322(5908), 1681-1685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161405
Kocher, M. G., Schudy, S., & Spantig, L. (2017). I lie? We lie! Why? Experimental evidence on a dishonesty shift in groups. Management Science. CESifo Working Paper n. 6008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2800
Kugler, T., Bornstein, G., Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2007). Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(6), 646-657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.12.003
Lima, G. A. S. F., Avelino, B. C., & Cunha, J. V. A. (2017). Narcissism: are accounting students using their personality traits to perform better?. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 11(31). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v11i31.137775
Lundquist, T., Ellingsen, T., Gribbe, E., & Johannesson, M. (2009). The aversion to lying. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(1-2), 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.010
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633-644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2006). Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 117-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.117
Melo Segundo, A. da C. (2016). Determinantes da fraude financeira: a relação entre os aspectos de racionalidade e a desonestidade. 2016. 62 f. Dissertation (Master Degree in Accounting) – Programa Multiinstitucional e Inter-Regional de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Contábeis da Universidade de Brasília, Universidade Federal da Paraíba e Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte.
Mullen, E., & Nadler, J. (2008). Moral spillovers: The effect of moral violations on deviant behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1239-1245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1120444
Pruckner, G. J., & Sausgruber, R. (2013). Honesty on the streets: A field study on newspaper purchasing. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 661-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12016
Ruffle, B. J., & Tobol, Y. (2014). Honest on Mondays: Honesty and the temporal separation between decisions and payoffs. European Economic Review, 65, 126-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.004
Sá, A. L. (2001). Ética profissional. Atlas.
Santos, P. F. dos. (2011). A desonestidade de pessoas honestas um experimento no Brasil. 2011. 97 f. Dissertation (Master Degree in Economic) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia da Universidade de Brasília.
Sen, A. (1993). Does business ethics make economic sense?. In The ethics of business in a global economy (pp. 53-66). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8165-3_6
Sen, A. (1999). Sobre ética e economia. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Smith, A. (1983). A riqueza das nações–investigação sobre sua natureza e causas. São Paulo: Abril.
Sutter, M. (2009). Deception through telling the truth?! Experimental evidence from individuals and teams. The Economic Journal, 119(534), 47-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02205.x
Tomazelli, Karlo Giordani. (2011). Desonestidade Acadêmica e Profissional – avaliação das percepções de estudantes de Administração e Contabilidade. 2011. 64 f. Final Work for the Graduation (Graduation in Business) – Departamento de Ciências Administrativas da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Utikal, V., & Fischbacher, U. (2013). Disadvantageous lies in individual decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 85, 108-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.11.011
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Os autores detêm os direitos autorais relativos ao seu artigo e cedem à Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança os direitos exclusivos de primeira publicação (englobando comunicação ao público e reprodução), com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição Não Comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC).
Esta licença permite que terceiros remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do trabalho publicado, desde que para fins não comerciais, atribuindo o devido crédito de autoria e publicação inicial neste periódico.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada neste periódico (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional, em site pessoal, publicar uma tradução, ou capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial neste periódico, desde que sem uso/distribuição comercial.
