Efeitos da Avaliação de Desempenho na Performance Gerencial Mediada pelo Feedback e Sistema de Recompensas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2019v22n1a3Palavras-chave:
Avaliação de desempenho, Performance gerencial, Feedback, Sistema de recompensas.Resumo
Objetivo: Este estudo analisa os efeitos da avaliação de desempenho na performance gerencial mediada pelo feedback e pelo sistema de recompensas.
Método: Uma survey foi realizada com 194 gestores de empresas brasileiras listadas entre as Melhores & Maiores da Revista Exame de 2016 e um modelo estrutural foi proposto para testar as hipóteses da pesquisa.
Originalidade/relevância: A pesquisa denota que diferentes tipos de controles de um Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) estão associados entre si, e que contribuem de maneiras distintas e complementares na explicação da performance gerencial. O sistema de recompensas foi o construto que se destacou na explicação da relação entre avaliação de desempenho e performance gerencial. A relevância do estudo está na investigação simultânea de múltiplos sistemas de controle de um PMS, o que pode contribuir para entender a relação entre eles e seus efeitos no desempenho.
Resultados: Os resultados da pesquisa indicam que a avaliação de desempenho tem efeito direto no feedback e no sistema de recompensas e indireto na performance dos gestores. O maior efeito indireto da avaliação de desempenho na performance gerencial via sistema de recompensas pode ser oriundo do desenho do PMS adotado pelas empresas pesquisadas, em que predominam bônus, compensações e sanções.
Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: Este estudo contribui para o corpo da literatura que examina os efeitos do PMS no desempenho individual em detrimento do desempenho organizacional. Contribui também para a lacuna de pesquisas relativas ao sistema de recompensas e desempenho individual, já que estudos anteriores apresentaram entendimentos distintos quanto aos seus efeitos.
Downloads
Referências
Appuhami, R. (2017). Exploring the relationship between strategic performance measurement systems and managers' creativity: the mediating role of psychological empowerment and organizational learning. Accounting & Finance. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12287
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4-5), 303-345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6
Bone, H. (2017). The effects of financial and non-financial performances towards the managerial performances with interpersonal trust as a mediation variable. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1190-1202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2016-0072
Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2012). Human resource management: theory and practice. Palgrave.
Buathong, S., & Bangchokdee, S. (2017). The use of the performance measures in Thai public hospitals. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(4), 472-485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-03-2017-0043
Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Tayler, W. B., & Wood, D. A. (2016). Compensation or feedback: motivating performance in multidimensional tasks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50(1), 27-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.003
Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2012). The effects of preventive and detective controls on employee performance and motivation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(2), 432-452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01106.x
Dahling, J., O'Malley, A. L., & Chau, S. L. (2015). Effects of feedback motives on inquiry and performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 199-215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2012-0409
Dal Vesco, D. G., Beuren, I. M., & Popik, F. (2016). Percepção de justiça na avaliação de desempenho e satisfação do trabalho. Enfoque Reflexão Contábil, 35(3), 121-138. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v35i3.28333
Derfuss, K. (2015). Reconsidering the participative budgeting-performance relation: a meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 17-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.07.001
Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Development of professional expertise: toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. doi: 10.2307/3150980
Franco-Santos, M., & Otley, D. (2018). Reviewing and theorizing the unintended consequences of performance management systems. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(3), 696-730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12183
Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 79-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001
Govaerts, M. J. B., Van de Wiel, M. W. J., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2013). Quality of feedback following performance assessments: does assessor expertise matter? European Journal of Training and Development, 37(1), 105-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591311293310
Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., & Widener, S. K. (2010). The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 689-706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.004
Groen, B. A., Wouters, M. J., & Wilderom, C. P. (2017). Employee participation, performance metrics, and job performance: A survey study based on self-determination theory. Management Accounting Research, 36(1), 51-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.10.001
Guo, L., Wong-On-Wing, B., & Lui, G. (2012). Motivational effects of linking incentives to different measures in strategic performance measurement systems: implications for Proactive strategic behavior. In: Advances in Management Accounting (pp. 209-240). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7871(2012)0000020015
Hair, J. F. Jr, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). USA: Sage Publications.
Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2-3), 141-163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.004
Hall, M. (2011). Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers’ mental model development? Management Accounting Research, 22(2), 68-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.002
Henri, J. F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529-558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
Lau, C. M. (2015). The effects of nonfinancial performance measures on role clarity, procedural fairness and managerial performance. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 142-165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-03-2013-0017
Lau, C. M., & Amirthalingam, V. (2014). The relative importance of comprehensive performance measurement systems and financial performance measures on employees’ perceptions of informational fairness. In: Advances in Management Accounting (pp. 77-115). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Luckett, P. F., & Eggleton, I. R. (1991). Feedback and management accounting: a review of research into behavioural consequences. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(4), 371-394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90028-D
Mahama, H., & Cheng, M. M. (2013). The effect of managers' enabling perceptions on costing system use, psychological empowerment, and task performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(1), 89-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-50333
Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package – opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
Marginson, D., McAulay, L., Roush, M., & Van Zijl, T. (2014). Examining a positive psychological role for performance measures. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 63-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.002
Nae, E. Y., Moon, H. K., & Choi, B. K. (2015). Seeking feedback but unable to improve work performance? Qualified feedback from trusted supervisors matters. Career Development International, 20(1), 81-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2014-0107
Neely, A. (2002). Avaliação do desempenho das empresas: porquê, o quê e como. Lisboa: Caminho Portugal.
Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0115
Otley, D. T., & Berry, A. J. (1980). Control, organisation and accounting. Accounting Organizations and Society, 5(2), 231-244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90012-4
Shields, M. D., Deng, F. J., & Kato, Y. (2000). The design and effects of control systems: tests of direct-and indirect-effects models. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(2), 185-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00041-0
Souza, G. E., & Beuren, I. M. (2018). Reflexos do sistema de mensuração de desempenho habilitante na performance de tarefas e satisfação no trabalho. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 29(77), 194-212. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201805850
Sparrow, P. R., & Bognanno, M. (1993). Competency requirement forecasting: issues for international selection and assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(1), 50-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00083.x
Thornock, T. A. (2016). How the timing of performance feedback impacts individual performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 55 (1), 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.09.002
Tung, T. D. (2018). How spirituality, climate, and compensation affect job performance. Social Responsibility Journal, (just-accepted), 00-00. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0086
Van der Hauwaert, E., & Bruggeman, W. (2015). The effect of monetary rewards on autonomous motivation in an enabling performance measurement context. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(3), 341-356.
Veen-Dirks, P. V. (2010). Different uses of performance measures: the evaluation versus reward of production managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 141-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.002
Wåhlberg, A. E., & Poom, L. (2015). An empirical test of nonresponse bias in internet surveys. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 336-347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1111212
Wang, P., Lu, Z., & Sun, J. (2018). Influential effects of intrinsic-extrinsic incentive factors on management performance in New Energy Enterprises. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(292), 1-10. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020292
Wee, S. H., Foong, S. Y., & Tse, M. S. C. (2014). Management control systems and organizational learning: the effects of design and use. Accounting Research Journal, 27(2), 169-187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-05-2013-0026
Wouters, M., & Roijmans, D. (2011). Using prototypes to induce experimentation and knowledge integration in the development of enabling accounting information. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 708-736. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01055.x
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores detêm os direitos autorais relativos ao seu artigo e cedem à Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança os direitos exclusivos de primeira publicação (englobando comunicação ao público e reprodução), com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição Não Comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC).
Esta licença permite que terceiros remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do trabalho publicado, desde que para fins não comerciais, atribuindo o devido crédito de autoria e publicação inicial neste periódico.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada neste periódico (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional, em site pessoal, publicar uma tradução, ou capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial neste periódico, desde que sem uso/distribuição comercial.
