Efeitos da Avaliação de Desempenho na Performance Gerencial Mediada pelo Feedback e Sistema de Recompensas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2019v22n1a3Keywords:
Avaliação de desempenho, Performance gerencial, Feedback, Sistema de recompensas.Abstract
Objetivo: Este estudo analisa os efeitos da avaliação de desempenho na performance gerencial mediada pelo feedback e pelo sistema de recompensas.
Método: Uma survey foi realizada com 194 gestores de empresas brasileiras listadas entre as Melhores & Maiores da Revista Exame de 2016 e um modelo estrutural foi proposto para testar as hipóteses da pesquisa.
Originalidade/relevância: A pesquisa denota que diferentes tipos de controles de um Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) estão associados entre si, e que contribuem de maneiras distintas e complementares na explicação da performance gerencial. O sistema de recompensas foi o construto que se destacou na explicação da relação entre avaliação de desempenho e performance gerencial. A relevância do estudo está na investigação simultânea de múltiplos sistemas de controle de um PMS, o que pode contribuir para entender a relação entre eles e seus efeitos no desempenho.
Resultados: Os resultados da pesquisa indicam que a avaliação de desempenho tem efeito direto no feedback e no sistema de recompensas e indireto na performance dos gestores. O maior efeito indireto da avaliação de desempenho na performance gerencial via sistema de recompensas pode ser oriundo do desenho do PMS adotado pelas empresas pesquisadas, em que predominam bônus, compensações e sanções.
Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: Este estudo contribui para o corpo da literatura que examina os efeitos do PMS no desempenho individual em detrimento do desempenho organizacional. Contribui também para a lacuna de pesquisas relativas ao sistema de recompensas e desempenho individual, já que estudos anteriores apresentaram entendimentos distintos quanto aos seus efeitos.
Downloads
References
Appuhami, R. (2017). Exploring the relationship between strategic performance measurement systems and managers' creativity: the mediating role of psychological empowerment and organizational learning. Accounting & Finance. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12287
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4-5), 303-345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6
Bone, H. (2017). The effects of financial and non-financial performances towards the managerial performances with interpersonal trust as a mediation variable. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1190-1202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2016-0072
Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2012). Human resource management: theory and practice. Palgrave.
Buathong, S., & Bangchokdee, S. (2017). The use of the performance measures in Thai public hospitals. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(4), 472-485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-03-2017-0043
Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Tayler, W. B., & Wood, D. A. (2016). Compensation or feedback: motivating performance in multidimensional tasks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50(1), 27-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.003
Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2012). The effects of preventive and detective controls on employee performance and motivation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(2), 432-452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01106.x
Dahling, J., O'Malley, A. L., & Chau, S. L. (2015). Effects of feedback motives on inquiry and performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(2), 199-215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2012-0409
Dal Vesco, D. G., Beuren, I. M., & Popik, F. (2016). Percepção de justiça na avaliação de desempenho e satisfação do trabalho. Enfoque Reflexão Contábil, 35(3), 121-138. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v35i3.28333
Derfuss, K. (2015). Reconsidering the participative budgeting-performance relation: a meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 17-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.07.001
Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Development of professional expertise: toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. doi: 10.2307/3150980
Franco-Santos, M., & Otley, D. (2018). Reviewing and theorizing the unintended consequences of performance management systems. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(3), 696-730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12183
Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 79-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001
Govaerts, M. J. B., Van de Wiel, M. W. J., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2013). Quality of feedback following performance assessments: does assessor expertise matter? European Journal of Training and Development, 37(1), 105-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591311293310
Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., & Widener, S. K. (2010). The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 689-706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.004
Groen, B. A., Wouters, M. J., & Wilderom, C. P. (2017). Employee participation, performance metrics, and job performance: A survey study based on self-determination theory. Management Accounting Research, 36(1), 51-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.10.001
Guo, L., Wong-On-Wing, B., & Lui, G. (2012). Motivational effects of linking incentives to different measures in strategic performance measurement systems: implications for Proactive strategic behavior. In: Advances in Management Accounting (pp. 209-240). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7871(2012)0000020015
Hair, J. F. Jr, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). USA: Sage Publications.
Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2-3), 141-163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.004
Hall, M. (2011). Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers’ mental model development? Management Accounting Research, 22(2), 68-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.002
Henri, J. F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529-558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
Lau, C. M. (2015). The effects of nonfinancial performance measures on role clarity, procedural fairness and managerial performance. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 142-165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-03-2013-0017
Lau, C. M., & Amirthalingam, V. (2014). The relative importance of comprehensive performance measurement systems and financial performance measures on employees’ perceptions of informational fairness. In: Advances in Management Accounting (pp. 77-115). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Luckett, P. F., & Eggleton, I. R. (1991). Feedback and management accounting: a review of research into behavioural consequences. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(4), 371-394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90028-D
Mahama, H., & Cheng, M. M. (2013). The effect of managers' enabling perceptions on costing system use, psychological empowerment, and task performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(1), 89-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-50333
Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package – opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
Marginson, D., McAulay, L., Roush, M., & Van Zijl, T. (2014). Examining a positive psychological role for performance measures. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 63-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.002
Nae, E. Y., Moon, H. K., & Choi, B. K. (2015). Seeking feedback but unable to improve work performance? Qualified feedback from trusted supervisors matters. Career Development International, 20(1), 81-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2014-0107
Neely, A. (2002). Avaliação do desempenho das empresas: porquê, o quê e como. Lisboa: Caminho Portugal.
Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0115
Otley, D. T., & Berry, A. J. (1980). Control, organisation and accounting. Accounting Organizations and Society, 5(2), 231-244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90012-4
Shields, M. D., Deng, F. J., & Kato, Y. (2000). The design and effects of control systems: tests of direct-and indirect-effects models. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(2), 185-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00041-0
Souza, G. E., & Beuren, I. M. (2018). Reflexos do sistema de mensuração de desempenho habilitante na performance de tarefas e satisfação no trabalho. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 29(77), 194-212. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201805850
Sparrow, P. R., & Bognanno, M. (1993). Competency requirement forecasting: issues for international selection and assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(1), 50-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00083.x
Thornock, T. A. (2016). How the timing of performance feedback impacts individual performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 55 (1), 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.09.002
Tung, T. D. (2018). How spirituality, climate, and compensation affect job performance. Social Responsibility Journal, (just-accepted), 00-00. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0086
Van der Hauwaert, E., & Bruggeman, W. (2015). The effect of monetary rewards on autonomous motivation in an enabling performance measurement context. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(3), 341-356.
Veen-Dirks, P. V. (2010). Different uses of performance measures: the evaluation versus reward of production managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 141-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.002
Wåhlberg, A. E., & Poom, L. (2015). An empirical test of nonresponse bias in internet surveys. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 336-347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1111212
Wang, P., Lu, Z., & Sun, J. (2018). Influential effects of intrinsic-extrinsic incentive factors on management performance in New Energy Enterprises. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(292), 1-10. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020292
Wee, S. H., Foong, S. Y., & Tse, M. S. C. (2014). Management control systems and organizational learning: the effects of design and use. Accounting Research Journal, 27(2), 169-187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-05-2013-0026
Wouters, M., & Roijmans, D. (2011). Using prototypes to induce experimentation and knowledge integration in the development of enabling accounting information. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 708-736. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01055.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors hold the copyright to their article and grant the Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance the exclusive rights of first publication (including communication to the public and reproduction), with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC).
This license allows third parties to remodel, adapt, and create from the published work, as long as it is for non-commercial purposes, giving due credit for authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to enter into additional separate agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publish a translation, or publish a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided there is no commercial use/distribution.
