The Effect of Corporate Diversification on Tax Aggressiveness in Brazilian Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2020v23n1a3Keywords:
Tax aggressiveness, Corporate diversification, Single-segmentAbstract
Objective: To verify whether firms that operate in several different business sectors are more tax aggressive in comparison to firms that operate in a single or a few segments.
Method: The study analyzes a sample of firms listed in the Brazilian stock exchange B3 in the period from 2010 to 2017. To verify the existence of a relationship between diversification and tax aggressiveness, a data panel regression model with fixed effect of company and year was used and additionally the logit model. To measure tax aggressiveness, it was used ETR (effective rate of taxation) and ETR long (long-run effective tax rates).
Originality/relevance: This type of research is unprecedented in Brazil, being a point not yet explored in the literature, in view of its peculiarities of a developing country. Relevant to define the effect of diversification on tax aggressiveness.
Results: It was observed that the more companies are diversified, the lower the probability of having low tax aggressiveness, or that more diversified companies are more likely to be more aggressive, compared to companies with only one segment. Therefore, the results indicate that among companies with segments, the more segments, the more aggressive the company.
Theoretical/Methodological contributions: A better understanding of the phenomenon of tax aggressiveness, causes and determinants, having implications for financial statement users, in particular tax regulators.
Downloads
References
Aggarwal, R. K., & Samwick, A. A. (2003). Why do managers diversify their firms? Agency reconsidered. The Journal of Finance, 58(1), 71-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00519
Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., & Larcker, D. F. (2012). The incentives for tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 391-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.04.001
Balakrishnan, K., Blouin, J., & Guay, W. (2018). Tax Aggressiveness and Corporate Transparency. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52130
Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification's effect on firm value. Journal of financial economics, 37(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00798-6
Bird, A., & Karolyi, S. A. (2016). Governance and taxes: Evidence from regression discontinuity. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51520.
Cabello, O. G. (2012). Análise dos efeitos das práticas de tributação do lucro na Effective Tax Rate (ETR) das companhias abertas brasileiras: uma abordagem da teoria das escolhas contábeis (tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo.
Calijuri, M. S. S. (2009). Avaliação da gestão tributária a partir de uma perspectiva multidisciplinar, tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo).
Campa, J. M., & Kedia, S. (2002). Explaining the diversification discount. The journal of finance, 57(4), 1731-1762. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00476
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. In Projeto de pesquisa métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto.
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03811.x
Dunbar, A., Higgins, D., Phillips, J., & Plesko, G. (2010). What do measures of tax aggressiveness measure. In Proceedings of the National Tax Association Annual Conference on Taxation (pp. 18-26).
Erickson, M. M., & Wang, S. W. (2007). Tax benefits as a source of merger premiums in acquisitions of private corporations. The Accounting Review, 82(2), 359-387. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.2.359
Ettredge, M. L., Kwon, S. Y., Smith, D. B., & Stone, M. S. (2006). The effect of SFAS No. 131 on the cross-segment variability of profits reported by multiple segment firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(1), 91-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-6397-9
Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., Wu, Q., & Yan, M. (2014). Are female CFOs less tax aggressive? Evidence from tax aggressiveness. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 36(2), 171-202. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-50819
Junior, J. N., & Funchal, B. (2013). O efeito da diversificação corporativa na estrutura de capital das firmas brasileiras. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 24(62), 154-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772013000200006.
Grunow, A., Beuren, I. M., & Hein, N. (2010). Métodos de preço de transferência interna utilizados nas maiores empresas do Brasil/Pricing methods of internal transference used by the biggest brazilian companies. Revista Economia & Gestão, 10(24), 74-102. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1984-6606.2010v10n24p74
Guenther, D. A., Matsunaga, S. R., & Williams, B. M. (2016). Is tax avoidance related to firm risk? The Accounting Review, 92(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51408
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
Hoechle, D., Schmid, M., Walter, I., & Yermack, D. (2012). How much of the diversification discount can be explained by poor corporate governance? Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.025
Klassen, K. J., Lisowsky, P., & Mescall, D. (2015). The role of auditors, non-auditors, and internal tax departments in corporate tax aggressiveness. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51137
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.003
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.006
Lang, L. H., & Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin's q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of political economy, 102(6), 1248-1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.006
Lennox, C., Lisowsky P., & Pittman, J. Tax aggressiveness and accounting fraud. Journal of Accounting Research, v. 51, n. 4, p. 739-778, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/joar.12002
Lin, S., Tong, N., & Tucker, A. L. (2014). Corporate tax aggression and debt. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.035
Lopo Martinez, A., Ribeiro, A. C., & Funchal,B. (2019) Sarbanes Oxley Act and Taxation: A study of the effects on the tax aggressiveness of Brazilian firms. Contabilidade Vista & Revista, 30 (1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.22561/cvr.v30i1.4525
Martinez, A. L. (2017). Tax aggressiveness: a literature survey. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 11. https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v11i0.1724
Martinez, A. L., & Silva, R. F. (2017). Agressividade Fiscal e o Custo de Capital de Terceiros no Brasil. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 7(1), 240-251. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29386/rgfc.v7i1.2904
Martinez, A. L., & Dalfior, M. D. (2016). Agressividade Fiscal entre Companhias Controladoras e Controladas. Revista da Receita Federal: estudos tributários e aduaneiros, 2(1), 344-362.
Martinez, A. L., Lessa, R. C., & de Jesus Moraes, A. (2014). Remuneração dos auditores perante a agressividade tributária e governança corporativa no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade e Controladoria, 6(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rcc.v6i3.34593
Martinez, A. L., & Ramalho, G. C. (2014). Family Firms and Tax Aggressiveness in Brazil. International Business Research, 7(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v7n3p129
May, D. O. (1995). Do managerial motives influence firm risk reduction strategies?. The journal of finance, 50(4), 1291-1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04059.x
Motta, F., & Martinez, A. (2015). Agressividade fiscal em sociedades de economia mista. Anais da Enanpad, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil, 39.
Scholes, M. S., Wolfson, M.A. ,Erickson, M.M., Hanlon, M. L., Maydew E. L. & Shevlin, T. Taxes and business strategy: a planning approach, Fifth edition, Boston : Pearson, 2015, 510 p.
Servaes, H. (1996). The value of diversification during the conglomerate merger wave. The Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1201-1225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb04067.x
Shackelford, D. A., & Shevlin, T. (2001). Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 321-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00022-2
Silva, J. M. D. (2017). A influência do ciclo de vida organizacional sobre o nível de planejamento tributário, Tese doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo.
Souza, J. A., Sarlo Neto, A., Mendonça, D. J., & Benedicto, G. C. (2016). Factors influencing the disclosure of information about operating segments in Brazil: analysis encompassing the first five years of CPC 22 Application. Revista Capital Científico - Eletrônica, 14(4), 109-125.
Tôrres, H. T. (2001). Direito tributário internacional: planejamento tributário e operações transnacionais. Revista dos Tribunais.
Troberg, P., Kinnunen, J., & Seppänen, H. J. (2010). What drives cross-segment diversity in returns and risks? Evidence from Japanese and US firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 45(1), 44-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2010.01.003.
Vello, A., & Martinez, A. L. (2014). Planejamento tributário eficiente: uma análise de sua relação com o risco de mercado. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 11(23), 117-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2014v11n23p117.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. Introdução à econometria: uma abordagem moderna (6a ed., P.Silva e L.Koeppl, Trad.). São Paulo: Cengage Learning. 2016.
Zheng, S. (2017). Can corporate diversification induce more tax avoidance? Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 41, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2017.05.008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors hold the copyright to their article and grant the Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance the exclusive rights of first publication (including communication to the public and reproduction), with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC).
This license allows third parties to remodel, adapt, and create from the published work, as long as it is for non-commercial purposes, giving due credit for authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to enter into additional separate agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publish a translation, or publish a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided there is no commercial use/distribution.