Relação entre Saliência de Stakeholders e Desempenho Financeiro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2018v21n2a4Keywords:
Saliência, Gestão de stakeholders, Desempenho financeiro, Análise de conteúdo.Abstract
Entender a relação entre a gestão de stakeholders e o desempenho organizacional permitiria aos gestores alocar, de forma mais eficiente, os recursos da empresa, priorizando os stakeholders mais importantes para o crescimento organizacional. Com vistas a contribuir com essa questão, este estudo objetiva analisar a relação entre a saliência do stakeholder e o desempenho financeiro da empresa. O modelo de saliência embasa-se na percepção dos gestores quanto a três atributos dos stakeholders: poder, legitimidade e urgência. A amostra é composta por 108 empresas brasileiras que fizeram ofertas públicas de ações nos anos de 2003 a 2013. Os dados foram coletados dos prospectos definitivos publicados pelas empresas e do banco de dados da Economatica®. Os procedimentos metodológicos foram realizados em duas etapas, sendo a primeira de análise de conteúdo e a segunda de teste da relação saliência-desempenho por meio da correlação de Pearson e de modelos de regressão múltipla. Os resultados mostram evidências de uma relação positiva e significante da saliência dos stakeholders cliente e funcionário com o desempenho financeiro de longo prazo. Como contribuição, esse estudo testa, empiricamente, a relação entre a saliência e o desempenho financeiro no contexto brasileiro.
Downloads
References
Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525. Doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/256973
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304-1320. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1980
Boaventura, J. M. G., da Silva, R. S., & Bandeira-de-Mello, R. (2012). Performance financeira corporativa e performance social corporativa: desenvolvimento metodológico e contribuição teórica dos estudos empíricos. Revista de Contabilidade e Finanças, 23(60), 232-245. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772012000300008
Boaventura, J. M. G., Fontes, L. G. P., Sarturi, G., & Armando, E. (2017). Critérios para identificação da saliência de stakeholders através da análise de conteúdo. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 9(2), 03-29.
Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2016). Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 276-297. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0420
Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Invited editorial: drilling for micro-foundations of human capital–based competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1429-1443. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310397772
Coombs, J. E., & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 827-840. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.476
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/258888
Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 895-907. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.759
David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. J. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 91-100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.571
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
Egels-Zandén, N., & Sandberg, J. (2010). Distinctions in descriptive and instrumental stakeholder theory: a challenge for empirical research. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(1), 35-49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01577.x
Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205. Doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/259074
Gomes, R. C., & Gomes, L. D. O. M. (2015). In search of a stakeholder management theory for third sector organizations. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 18(1), 43-60.
Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1999). A look at the financial-social performance nexus when quality of management is held constant. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 12(1), 87-99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007770406555
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58-74. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.801
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97-124. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20132314
Lähdesmäki, M., Siltaoja, M., & Spence, L. J. (2017). Stakeholder salience for small businesses: asocial proximity perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3707-z
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180-194. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23464011
Mascena, K. M. C., Kim, J., Fischmann, A. A., & Corrêa, H. L. (2015). Priorização de stakeholders: contribuição dos estudos teóricos e empíricos. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 8, 42-59. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1983465916845
Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 409-422. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0007-7
Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 571-601. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0441-1
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. Doi: https://10.2307/259247
Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Whitwell, G. J. (2011). Stakeholder salience revisited: refining, redefining, and refueling an underdeveloped conceptual tool. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 357-378. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0818-9
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313434
Priem, R. L. (2007). A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 219-235. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23464055
Ramalho, R. T., Bortolon, P. M., & Macedo, M. A. S. (2017). Plano de opções de compra de ações, oportunidades de crescimento e desempenho: evidências na BMF&BOVESPA. Contabilidade, Gestão & Governança, 20(3), 483-506. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21714/1984-3925_2017v20n3a9
Sarturi, G., Seravalli, C., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2015). Afinal, o que é distribuir valor para os stakeholders? Uma análise bibliográfica sobre o tema. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 8, 92-113. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1983465916556
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258788
Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 314-329. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2337
Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-557. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1985.4278989
Viana Júnior, D. B. C., Marques, D. B., Domingos, S. R. M., & Ponte, V. M. R. (2017). A influência da política de dividendos sobre o valor de mercado: evidências em empresas brasileiras. Contabilidade, Gestão & Governança, 20(2), 175-194. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21714/1984-3925_2017v20n2a1
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of economic and social organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zhao, X., & Murrell, A. J. (2016). Revisiting the corporate social performance-financial performance link: a replication of Waddock and Graves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2378-2388. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2579
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors hold the copyright to their article and grant the Journal of Accounting, Management and Governance the exclusive rights of first publication (including communication to the public and reproduction), with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC).
This license allows third parties to remodel, adapt, and create from the published work, as long as it is for non-commercial purposes, giving due credit for authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to enter into additional separate agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publish a translation, or publish a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal, provided there is no commercial use/distribution.
