Tomada de Decisão Estratégica: Mapeamento das Pesquisas a Partir da Análise Fatorial Exploratória e Escalonamento Multidimensional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2017v20n1a6Palavras-chave:
Tomada de decisão, Alto Escalão, EstratégiaResumo
Para compreender as conexões entre autores, conceitos e teorias que abordam o tema de tomada de decisão estratégica, neste artigo foram analisadas as citações e co-citações de estudos publicados até 2014. A amostra foi de 489 artigos publicados em periódicos internacionais incluídos na base da Web of Science - ISI Web of Knowledge. A pesquisa foi realizada com a utilização de palavras-chave que possibilitaram a identificação do maior número possível de artigos relacionados ao tema. Por meio do Escalonamento Multidimensional-MDS e da Análise Fatorial Exploratória–EFA foram identificadas as relações conceituais e teóricas envolvidas nestes estudos. Os resultados demonstram que de 1980 a 2014 três diferentes fatores se destacam: o primeiro relacionado com estudos sobre conflitos; o segundo fator ligado ao Top Management Team-TMT e a tomada de decisão; e o terceiro relacionado aos processos. Também foi identificado que mais recentemente - de 2013 a 2014 - os estudos sobre a tomada de decisão estratégica estão convergindo para a análise de conflito e processo, composição e controle, mantendo-se a Teoria do Alto Escalão como a teoria central nesses estudos, sendo esta a principal contribuição deste artigo.Downloads
Referências
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A Theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: a conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107. http://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Glenview: Scott and Foresman.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123–148. http://doi.org/10.2307/256633
Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495–516. http://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300401
Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S.E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107–124. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Barroso, C., Villegas, M. M., & Pérez-Calero, L. (2011). Board influence on a firm’s internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 351–367. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00859.x
Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R.E. (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: effects on corporate strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 72–87. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1990.4308231
Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. Klein and S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bonn, I., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2007). Do or die - Strategic decision-making following a shock event. Tourism Management, 28(2), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.021
Bourgeois, L. J. (1980). Performance and consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 1(3), 227–248. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250010304
Bourgeois, L. J. (1985). Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 548–573. http://doi.org/10.2307/256113
Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.7.816
Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: a contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301–312. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160404
Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2016). Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Influences on Upper Echelons During Strategy Process. Journal of Management, 42(1), 174–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617240
Camelo-Ordaz, C., García-Cruz, J., & Sousa-Ginel, E. (2015). The Influence of Top Management Team Conflict on Firm Innovativeness. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(6), 957–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9424-4
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper Echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 639–660. http://doi.org/10.2307/3069408
Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: how narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202–237. http://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211427534
Chen, M., Lin, H., & Michel, J. G. (2010). Navigating in a hypercompetitive environment: the roles of action aggressiveness and TMT integration. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1410–1430. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.891
Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. http://doi:10.2307/2392088
Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
De Dreu, C .K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. http://doi.org/10.5465/APBPP.2002.7516590
Dean, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368–396. http://doi.org/10.2307/256784
Dess, G. G. (1987). Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: Competitors in a fragmented industry. Strategic Management Journal, 8(3), 259–277. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080305
Dess, G. G., & Davis, P. S. (1984). Porter’s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 467–488. http://doi.org/10.2307/256040
Dess, G. G., & Origer, N. K. (1987). Environment, structure, and consensus in strategy formulation: a conceptual integration. The Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 313–330. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1987.4307943
Deutsch, Y., Keil, T., & Laamanen, T. (2011). A dual agency view of board compensation: the joint effects of outside director and CEO stock options on firm risk. Strategic Management Journal, 32(2), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.876
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989a). Agency theory: an assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. http://doi.org/10.2307/258191
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989b). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–576. http://doi.org/10.2307/256434
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31(4), 737–770. http://doi.org/10.2307/256337
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504–529. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393315
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94034
Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538. http://doi.org/10.2307/256485
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 484. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393314
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organizations. New York: West Publishing Company.
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D.C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.2202133
Fredrickson, J. W. (1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: extension, observations, future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 445–466, http://doi.org/10.2307/256039
Fredrickson, J. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1984). Strategic decision processes: comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 399–423. http://doi.org/10.2307/255932
Guerrazzi, L. A. C., Brandão, M. M., Campos Junior, H., & Lourenço, C. E. (2015). Pesquisa em marketing e estratégia nos principais periódicos internacionais: um estudo bibliométrico sobre publicações no século XXI. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 14(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v14i1.2200
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: a conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich: JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons theory: an update. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. http://doi.org/10.2307/20159303
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659-684. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393871
Hambrick, D. C., & D’Aveni, R. A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38(10), 1445–1466, http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.10.1445
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 369–406). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Hambrick, D. C., Humphrey, S. E., & Gupta, A. (2015). Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2230
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper Echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. http://doi.org/10.2307/258434
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Roche, F., & Kelly, A. (2009). Decision comprehensiveness and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating role of managerial uncertainty preferences and environmental dynamism. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1289–1314. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00858.x
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3). 383–396, http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.10196729
Hsu, Y. T., & Huang, S. P. K. (2011). Top management team characteristics, decision-making style, and organizational performance. African Journal of Business Management, 5(30), 12099-12107. http://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1066
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557. http://doi.org/10.2307/2393737
Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465–495. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9107-0
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763. http://doi.org/10.2307/2667054
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kauer, D., Waldeck, T.C.P., & Schäffer, U. (2007). Effects of top management team characteristics on strategic decision making: Shifting attention to team member personalities and mediating processes. Management Decision, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 942–967, http://doi.org/10.1108/00251740710762017
Kellermanns, F. W., Walter, J., Floyd, S. W., Lechner, C., & Shaw, J. C. (2011). To agree or not to agree? A meta-analytical review of strategic consensus and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 126–133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.02.004
Khanna, P., Jones, C. D., & Boivie, S. (2014). Director human capital, information processing demands, and board effectiveness. Journal of Management, 40(2), 557–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515523
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79-88. http://doi.org/10.2307/973677
Maciel, C. O., Hocayen-da-Silva, A. J., & Castro, M. (2006). Importance of different models in decision making, explaining the strategic behavior in organizations. Perspectivas Contemporâneas, 1(2), 96–112.
March, J. G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Marôco, J. (2011). Análise estatística com a utilização do SPSS. Pero Pinheiro: Report Number.
Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2014). Firm Performance and Women on the Board: Evidence from Spanish Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Feminist Economics, 20(3), 136–162. http://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.895404
Mazhar, S., Zaidi, A., Saif, M. I., & Zaheer, A. (2010). The effect of workgroup heterogeneity on decision making: an empirical investigation. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10), 2132–2139.
Medeiros Júnior, R., Serra, F. A. R., & Ferreira, M. F. (2009). Alta administração como recurso estratégico: proposta de agenda brasileira de pesquisa a partir dos trabalhos de Hambrick. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 8(1), 52-77. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v8i1.1625
Michel, J. G., & Hambrick, D. C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 9–37. http://doi.org/10.2307/256471
Mueller, G. C., Mone, M. A., & Barker, V. L. (2007). Formal strategic analyses and organizational performance: decomposing the rational model. Organization Studies, 28(6), 853–883. http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607075262
Muller-Kahle, M. I., & Lewellyn, K. B. (2011). Did board configuration matter? The case of US subprime lenders. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(5), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00871.x
Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2011). The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: the choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 185–193. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.003
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615–631. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.6.615
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28. http://doi.org/10.2307/2667029
Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Pinto, R. F., Guerrazzi, L. A. C., Serra, B. P. C., & Kniess, C. T. (2016). A Pesquisa em Administração Estratégica: um Estudo Bibliométrico em Periódicos Internacionais de Estratégia no Período de 2008 a 2013. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 15(2), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v15i2.2334
Queiroz, A., Reis, M., & Rocha, J. (2016). Decision Making Models in the Financial Market: A Study in the Light of Prospect Theory and Limited Rationality. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 19(2), 211-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.21714/1984-3925_2016v19n2a3
Renshon, J., & Kahneman, D. (2017). Hawkish Biases and the Interdisciplinary Study of Conflict Decision-Making. In S. A. Yetiv & P. James (Eds.), Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations (pp. 51–81). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40823-1_3
Ribeiro, I. (2015). Implicações da Obra de March e Simon para as Teorias das Organizações e Tomada de Decisão. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 14(4), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v14i4.2285
Ribeiro, I., Serra, F., & Serra, B. (2016). Relações teóricas e conceituais em tomada de decisão estratégica. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 9(2), 58-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.19177/reen.v9e2201658-86
Rivas, J. L. (2012). Diversity & internationalization: the case of boards and TMT’s. International Business Review, 21(1), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.12.001
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: a comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus. The Academy of Management Journal, 29(1), 51–71. http://doi.org/10.2307/255859
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 745–772. http://doi.org/10.2307/256567
Serra, B. P. C., Serra, F. A. R., & Tomei, P. (2014). The research in top management team strategic decision-making: evolution and intellectual basis. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 16(40), 11–28. http://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2014v16n40p11
Serra, F. R., & Ferreira, M. P. (2010). Emerging determinants of firm performance: a case study research examining the strategy pillars from a resource-based view. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 8(1), 7–24. http://doi.org/10.1108/1536-541011047886
Simon, H. A. (1944). Decision-making and administrative organization. Public Administration Review, 4(1), 16–30. http://doi.org/10.2307/972435
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Sun, Y., & Shin, T. (2014). Rewarding poor performance: why do boards of directors increase new options in response to CEO underwater options? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(5), 408–421. http://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12065
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S. (1991). Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. San Francisco: Allyn & Bacon.
Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121. http://doi.org/10.2307/256474
Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., & Ortqvist, D. (2013). Supporting innovation in government-sponsored networks: the role of network board composition. International Small Business Journal, 31(8), 997–1020. http://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612447970
Yoshida, N. D., Wright, J. T. C., & Spers, R. G. (2013). Prospect of future as a support to search for information for business decision. Iberoamerican Journal of Strategic Management, 12(01), 208–235. http://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v12i1.1957
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os autores detêm os direitos autorais relativos ao seu artigo e cedem à Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança os direitos exclusivos de primeira publicação (englobando comunicação ao público e reprodução), com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição Não Comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC).
Esta licença permite que terceiros remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do trabalho publicado, desde que para fins não comerciais, atribuindo o devido crédito de autoria e publicação inicial neste periódico.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada neste periódico (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional, em site pessoal, publicar uma tradução, ou capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial neste periódico, desde que sem uso/distribuição comercial.
