Avaliação de Desempenho sob a Perspectiva da Justiça Organizacional: Revisão e Agenda de Pesquisa

Maiara Sardá Silva; Sandra Rolim Ensslin; Alcindo Cipriano Argolo Mendes

doi:10.51341/1984-3925_2021v24n3a7

Authors

Maiara Sardá Silva Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4650-8809
Sandra Rolim Ensslin Professora na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7420-8507
Alcindo Cipriano Argolo Mendes Professor na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-7117

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2021v24n3a7

Keywords:

Performance Appraisal, Organizational Justice, ProKnow-C

Abstract

Objective: Explore the literature on Performance Appraisal (PA) from the perspective of Organizational Justice, to collaborate with the construction of knowledge and with the identification of research gaps.

Theoretical approach: The Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist instrument was used to select and analyze, in a systematic and reflective way, the Bibliographic Portfolio (BP) representative of the theme.

Results: It was found the existence of: a literature focused on consequences for people, involving variables such as satisfaction and commitment; preponderance of studies that address PA at the individual level; and, lack of investigations into perceptions of interpersonal and informational justice. The articles mainly analyzed the antecedents and consequences of PA justice perceptions. Among the gaps there is the need to develop models customized to the context that integrate the perceptions of the four factors of justice and of each unit or organization; and the development of studies involving interpersonal and informational justice and perceptions at the organizational level.

Originality/Relevance: The study presents aspects of PA justice perceptions as a relevant factor that influences employee behavior and points out research gaps for the evolution of the theme.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: This study contributes scientifically as it compiles recognized articles and proposes a research agenda with topics for future investigation.

Social contributions/to management: The findings contribute to managers throughout the life cycle of a PAS, by showing how the perception of justice impacts the behavior of employees in achieving organizational goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maiara Sardá Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade

Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Possui graduação em Ciências Contábeis pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2016) e MBA em Gestão Financeira e Controladoria pelo Centro Universitário Estácio de Sá de Santa Catarina (2019). Atualmente é Assistente em Administração na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Tem experiência profissional na área de Administração, com Ênfase em Ciências Contábeis, atuando principalmente na Área de Controladoria, modelagem de controles e relatórios gerenciais, análise de demonstrações contábeis e análises de custos.

Sandra Rolim Ensslin, Professora na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Possui graduação em Ciência Contábeis pela Universidade Católica de Pelotas (1991), mestrado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (1995), doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2002) e Pós-Doutorado pela Universidad de Valencia - Espanha (2014). É Pesquisadora Produtividade do CNPq Nível 1D. Editora Científica da Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade (RCC) de janeiro de 2005 a agosto de 2016. Professora Titular da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina atuando no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade (PPGC/UFSC) e no Programa de Engenharia de Produção (EPS/UFSC). É Coordenadora Científica do Congresso Internacional de Desempenho Portuário (CIDESPORT) desde 2015, Coordenadora Científica do Congresso Internacional de Desempenho do Setor Público (CIDESP) desde 2017 e coordenadora do Núcleo de Pesquisas em Gestão e Avaliação de Desempenho Organizacional. É autora de capítulos de livros, de artigos publicados em periódicos internacionais e nacionais e de trabalhos socializados em anais de eventos científicos internacionais e nacionais. Tem experiência na área de Contabilidade e Engenharia de Produção, com ênfase em: Avaliação de Desempenho Organizacional, atuando principalmente nos contextos de apoio à decisão, mensuração e gestão do desempenho e em Sistemas de Avaliação de Desempenho (SADs) por meio da metodologia Multicritério de Apoio à Decisão Construtivista (MCDA-C); e, Processo para Seleção e Análise Crítica de Literatura por meio do ProKnow-C.

Alcindo Cipriano Argolo Mendes, Professor na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Graduado em Ciências Contábeis pela FIPAG (2003), mestre em Ciências Contábeis pela FUCAPE Business School (2008) e doutor em Contabilidade pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina-UFSC (2017). Ex-professor da Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), atualmente é professor adjunto da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), com experiência na área de Controladoria e Contabilidade Gerencial, tendo como principais interesses de pesquisa: Sistemas e Práticas de Controle Gerencial; Métodos Quantitativos e Análise de Dados; Behavioral Accounting e Governança Cooperativa. Atuou no mercado como empresário, contador e controller, com experiência em sistemas de avaliação de desempenho em organizações.

References

Bartol, K. M., Durham, C. C., & Poon, J. M. L. (2001). Influence of performance evaluation rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1106-1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1106

Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322

Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance measurement: Challenges for tomorrow. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x

Burney, L. L., Henle, C. A., & Widener, S. K. (2009). A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics, organizational justice, and extra- and in-role performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.002

Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 615-633. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.615

Cheng, S. Y. (2014). The mediating role of organizational justice on the relationship between administrative performance appraisal practices and organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1131-1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.816864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.816864

Choong, K. K. (2014). Has this large number of performance measurement publications contributed to its better understanding? A systematic review for research and applications. International Journal of Production Research, 52(14), 4174-4197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.866285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.866285

Chun, J. S., Brockner, J., & De Cremer, D. (2018). How temporal and social comparisons in performance evaluation affect fairness perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 145, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.01.003

Dusterhoff, C., Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2014). The Effects of Performance Rating, Leader-Member Exchange, Perceived Utility, and Organizational Justice on Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Applying a Moral Judgment Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1634-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1634-1

El Haddad, R., Karkoulian, S., & Nehme, R. (2019). The impact of 360 feedback appraisal system on organizational justice and sustainability: The mediating roles of gender and managerial levels. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(3), 712-728. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2018-1499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2018-1499

Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). Procedural Justice as a Two-Dimensional Construct: An Examination in the Performance Appraisal Context. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886301372004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886301372004

Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12(4), 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00070-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00070-0

Farndale, E., & Kelliher, C. (2013). Implementing performance appraisal: Exploring the employee experience. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 879-897. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21575

Franco-Santos, Lucianetti, & Bourne (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 79-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(85)90003-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001

Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 340-342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340

Gupta, V., & Kumar, S. (2013). Impact of performance appraisal justice on employee engagement: a study of Indian professionals. Employee Relations, 35(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451311279410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451311279410

Hartmann, F., & Slapničar, S. (2012). The perceived fairness of performance evaluation: The role of uncertainty. Management Accounting Research, 23(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2011.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2011.10.004

Heslin, P. A., & VandeWalle, D. (2011). Performance appraisal procedural justice: The role of a manager's implicit person theory. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1694-1718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342895

Holbrook, L. (2002). Contact Points and Flash Points: Conceptualizing the Use of Justice Mechanisms in the Performance Appraisal Interview. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00053-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00053-5

Holzer, M., Ballard, A., Kim, M., Peng, S., & Deat, F. (2019). Obstacles and Opportunities for Sustaining Performance Management Systems. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1405445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1405445

Jawahar, I. M. (2007). The influence of perceptions of fairness on performance appraisal reactions. Journal of Labor Research, 28(4), 735-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-007-9014-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-007-9014-1

Kim, S. E., & Rubianty, D. (2011). Perceived fairness of performance appraisals in the federal government: Does it matter? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(4), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11428903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X11428903

Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6), 751-754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.751

Lau, C. M., & Moser, A. (2008). Behavioral effects of non-financial performance measures: The role of procedural fairness. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2008.20.2.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2008.20.2.55

Lau, C. M., Wong, K. M., & Eggleton, I. (2008). Fairness of performance evaluation procedures and job satisfaction: The role of outcome-based and non-outcome-based effects. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2008.9663325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2008.9663325

Lau, C. M., & Martin-Sardesai, A. V. (2012). The role of organisational concern for workplace fairness in the choice of a performance measurement system. British Accounting Review, 44(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2012.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2012.07.006

Lau, C. M., & Tan, S. L. C. (2012). Budget targets as performance measures: The mediating role of participation and procedural fairness. British Accounting Review, 44 (3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7871(2012)0000020013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7871(2012)0000020013

Lau, C. M. (2015). The effects of non-financial performance measures on role clarity, procedural fairness and managerial performance. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 142-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-03-2013-0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-03-2013-0017

Palaiologos, A., Papazekos, P., & Panayotopoulou, L. (2011). Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(8), 826-840. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111168348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111168348

Pedersini, D. R., & Ensslin, S. R. (2020). Os Estudos Empíricos Internacionais no Setor Público Têm Feito Uso dos Sistemas de Avaliação de Desempenho em sua Plenitude? Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 13, 207-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.19177/reen.v12e02019207-232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v12e02019207-232

Richardson, R. J. (1999). Pesquisa social: Métodos e técnicas (3. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Roberts, G. E. (1994). Maximizing Performance-Appraisal System Acceptance - Perspectives From Municipal-Government Personnel Administrators. Public Personnel Management, 23(4), 525-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609402300402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609402300402

Selvarajan, T. T., & Cloninger, P. A. (2012). Can performance appraisals motivate employees to improve performance? A Mexican study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 3063-3084. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.637069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.637069

Selvarajan, T. T., Singh, B., & Solansky, S. (2018). Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees. Journal of Business Research, 85, 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.043

Tasca, J. E., Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R.; E Alves, & M. B. M. (2010) An approach for selecting a theoretical framework for the evaluation of training programs. Journal of European Industrial Training, v. 34, n. 7, p. 631-655, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591011070761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591011070761

Thiel, G. G., Ensslin, S. R., & Ensslin, L. (2017). Street Lighting Management and Performance Evaluation: Opportunities and Challenges. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 15(2), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.4335/15.2.303-328(2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4335/15.2.303-328(2017)

Thurston Jr, P. W., & McNall, L. (2010). Justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(3), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011023712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011023712

Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2012). Importance of system and leadership in performance appraisal. Personnel Review, 41(6), 756-776. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481211263692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481211263692

Valmorbida, S. M. I., Ensslin, L. (2016). Construção de conhecimento sobre avaliação de desempenho para gestão organizacional: uma investigação nas pesquisas científicas internacionais. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, v.13, n. 28, p. 123-148. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n28p123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n28p123