Analysis of the Relationship Between Audit Market Structure and Audit Fees Charged to Brazilian Companies

Cristian Schnidger, Cristiano Machado Costa, Vanusa Batista Pereira

Abstract


Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of market structure on audit fees, based on industrial economics theories.
Method: We use a Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model in which audit fees is a dependent variable and concentration measures, market share and leadership, and a proxy for audit quality are the main independent variables. The population was composed by the companies listed on Brazil Stock Exchange – B3, from 2010 to 2015, resulting in a sample with 1,663 observations in the period.
Originality/Relevance: This research explores different metrics of market structure and control variables for a sample and period not previously analyzed in the Brazilian literature. The article addresses a relevanttopic for competition regulatory agencies, clients of audit firms and external users of financial statements.
Results: The results confirmed the hypothesis that there is a positive relationship between market concentration and the audit fees, even when considering only the group of big firms. Evidence shows the existance of value to the brand and possible search for quality in auditing by publicly traded companies. We also found a positive relationship between audit fees and earnings management, contrary to the predicted hypothesis.
Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The results showed that firms with higher market share charged higher audit fees to their clients. Among the big firms, the leader has significantly higher audit fees than the other firms. In addition, the positive relationship between audit fees and earnings management may mean that the audit firms charge higher amounts for those clients who practice management more intensively.

Keywords


Audit fees; Market Structure; Market Leadership

References


Allen, A. M., Ramanna, K., & Roychowdhury, S. (2013). The auditing oligopoly and lobbying on accounting standards. Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper, (13-054).http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2187947

Audousset-Coulier, S., Jeny, A., & Jiang, L. (2016). The validity of auditor industry specialization measures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(1), 139-161.https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51176

Beattie, V., Goodacre, A., & Fearnley, S. (2003). And then there were four: A study of UK audit market concentrationcauses, consequences and the scope for market adjustment. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 11(3), 250-265.https://doi.org/10.1108/13581980310810561

Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary accounting research, 15(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x

Cahan, S. F., & Sun, J. (2015). The effect of audit experience on audit fees and audit quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(1), 78-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X14544503

Cameran, M. (2005). Audit fees and the large auditor premium in the Italian market. International Journal of Auditing, 9(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00205.x

Carlton, D. W., & Perloff, J. M. (2005). Modern industrial organization: Pearson/Addison Wesley. New York.

Carson, E., Redmayne, N. B., & Liao, L. (2014). Audit market structure and competition in Australia. AustralianAccounting Review, 24(4), 298-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12041

Castro, Walther Bottaro de Lima, Peleias, Ivam Ricardo, & Silva, Glauco Peres da. (2015). Determinantes dos Honorários de Auditoria: um Estudo nas Empresas Listadas na BM&FBOVESPA, Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 26(69), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201501560

Cho, M., Ki, E., & Kwon, S. Y. (2017). The effects of accruals quality on audit hours and audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 32(3), 372-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X15611323

Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality?. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 115-140. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.115

Ciconte, W., Knechel, W. R., & Schelleman, C. (2015). An examination of the relation between market structure and the profitability of audit engagements. Accounting & Finance, 55(3), 749-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12078

Dang, C., Li, F. & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance 86: 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006

Dantas, J. A., Chaves, S. de M. T., Sousa, G. de A., & Silva, E. M. da. (2012). Concentração de auditoria no mercado de capitais brasileiro. Revista De Contabilidade E Organizações, 6(14), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v6i14.45398

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of accounting and economics, 3(3), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The accounting review, 77(s-1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35

Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting review, 193-225. Retrieved on October 8, 2017, from https://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=722d6dbb-6e6d-4e87-b751-0e20b1b2b0fc%40sdc-v-sessmgr03

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Dunn, K., Kohlbeck, M. J., & Mayhew, B. W. (2013). The impact of market structure on audit price and quality. Available at SSRN 2258091. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2258091

Eichenseher, J. W., & Danos, P. (1981). The analysis of industry-specific auditor concentration: Towards an explanatory model. The Accounting Review, 56(3), 479. Retrieved on October 8, 2017, from https://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=7&sid=15146194-7a2b-44ed-855d-cb6864b4fc43%40sessionmgr102

Eshleman, J. D., & Guo, P. (2014). Abnormal audit fees and audit quality: The importance of considering managerial incentives in tests of earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(1), 117-138. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50560

Eshleman, J. D., & Lawson, B. P. (2017). Audit market structure and audit pricing. Accounting Horizons, 31(1), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51603

Francis, J. R. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of accounting and economics, 6(2), 133-151.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(84)90010-7

Francis, J. R., Stokes, D. J., & Anderson, D. (1999). City markets as a unit of analysis in audit research and the re-examination of Big 6 market shares. Abacus, 35(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00040

Ferguson, A., & Scott, T. (2014). What If There Were Three? Audit Pricing within the Big 4 and the Pricewaterhouse Coopers' Premium in the Australian Audit Market. International Journal of Auditing, 18(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12011

Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2003). Public Accounting Firms: Mandated Study on Consolidation and Competition. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved on September 24, 2017, from https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03864.pdf

Ghosh, A. A., Xing, C., & Wang, J. (2016). Audit quality of complex accounting estimates: evidence from audit tests of goodwill and special charges. Retrieved on November 21, 2017, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3086/c7f99edb160c8b6a0dbcc43360233b45d142.pdf

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2011). Econometria Básica-5. Amgh Editora. Retrieved on February 25, 2018, from https://www.academia.edu/40156994/ECONOMETRIA_B%C3%81SICA_5_edi%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Gujarati

Hallak, R. T. P., & Silva, A. L. C. D. (2012). Determinantes das despesas com serviços de auditoria e consultoria prestados pelo auditor independente no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 23(60), 223-231.https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772012000300007

Huang, T. C., Chang, H., & Chiou, J. R. (2015). Audit market concentration, audit fees, and audit quality: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(2), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51299

Huang, H. W., Lin, S., & Raghunandan, K. (2016). The volatility of other comprehensive income and audit fees. Accounting Horizons, 30(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51357

Hu, D. (2015). Abnormal Audit Fees and Auditor Size in the Japanese Audit Market. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 19(3), 141. Retrieved on November 21, 2017, from https://search.proquest.com/openview/bc8a16d436aebbfa134c39742b9fabea/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=29414

Ireland, J. C., & Lennox, C. S. (2002). The large audit firm fee premium: A case of selectivity bias?. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(1), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0201700104

Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of accounting research, 29(2), 193-228. Retrieved on September 14, 2017, fromhttp://jperera.pro.br/site/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/earningsmanagementduringimportreliefinvestigations61704.pdf

Kupfer, D., & Hasenclever, L. (2013). Economia industrial: fundamentos teóricos e práticas no Brasil. Elsevier.

Lopo Martinez, A., & Moraes, A. (2017). Relação entre a remuneração dos auditores e o gerenciamento de resultados contábeis. RAE - Revista De Administração De Empresas, 57(2), 148-157. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020170204

Martin, R. E. (1986). On judging quality by price: price dependent expectations, not price dependent preferences. Southern Economic Journal, 665-672. Retrieved on September 9, 2017, from: https://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=17b6bd4f-d0a1-43b4-9c5a-fae8db0d210b%40pdc-v-sessmgr03

McNichols, M. F. (2002). Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The accounting review, 77(s-1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.61

Palmrose, Z. V. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of accounting research, 24(1), 97-110. Retrieved on December 8, 2017, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2490806.pdf?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Palmrose, Z. V. (1988). 1987 Competitive Manuscript Co-Winner: An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Accounting review, 63(1), 55-73. Retrieved on December 8, 2017, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/247679?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Pearson, T., & Trompeter, G. (1994). Competition in the market for audit services: The effect of supplier concentration on audit fees. Contemporary accounting research, 11(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00439.x

Pinheiro, R. B. (2018). Auditoria independente: impacto da qualidade dos lucros sobre os honorários de auditoria. Retrieved on March 2, 2018, from http://www.ccsa.ufpb.br/ppgcc/contents/dissertacoes/dissertacao-renato-barros-pinheiro.pdf/view -

Pollak, R. A. (1977). Price dependent preferences. The American Economic Review, 67(2), 64-75. Retrieved on August 9, 2017, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1807221.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A100395e6d370a46c7a172de2441ea57e

Simon, D. T. (1997). Additional evidence on the large audit-firm fee premium as an indication of auditor quality. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 13(4), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v13i4.5738

Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of accounting research, 18(1), 161-190. 10.2307/2490397

Shy, O. (1995). Industrial organization: theory and applications. MIT press. Retrieved on December 5, 2018, from https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=tr4CjJ5LlRcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&ots=IfuJ8Hu_pl&sig=Vdfl-z93wKHebAyH5EupBSZ5RHY#v=onepage&q&f=false

Stigler, G. J. (1946). The theory of price. New York: Macmillan Company.

Stiglitz, J. E. (1997). Economics.2. ed. New York: W. W. Norton Company.

Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. MIT press. Retrieved on September 9, 2019, from https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=HIjsF0XONF8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Tirole,+J.+(1988).+The+theory+of+industrial+organization.+MIT+press.&ots=wtrfPEjf5l&sig=AaP5IO1KRCs6Gh4I4DjZ1mKfjk8#v=onepage&q=Tirole%2C%20J.%20(1988).%20The%20theory%20of%20industrial%20organization.%20MIT%20press.&f=false

Wang, K., Sewon, O., Iqbal, Z., & Smith, L. M. (2011). Auditor Market Share and Industry Specialization of Non-Big 4 Firms. Journal of Accountingand Finance, 11(2), 107. Retrieved on December 5, 2018, from http://m.www.na-businesspress.com/JAF/WangK_Web.pdf

Willekens, M., &Achmadi, C. (2003). Pricing and supplier concentration in the private client segment of the audit market: Market power or competition?. The International Journal of Accounting, 38(4), 431-455.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2003.09.002

Wootton, C. W., Tonge, S. D., &Wolk, C. M. (1994). Pre and post Big 8 mergers: Comparison of auditor concentrat. Accounting Horizons, 8(3), 58. Retrieved on September 9, 2019, from https://www.econbiz.de/Record/accounting-horizons-a-quarterly-publication-of-the-american-accounting-association/10008275787




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21714/1984-3925_2020v23n2a6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1984-3925

Licença Creative Commons
The JAMG adopts the Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC ND Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 

Indexing and Abstracting:

Logotipo SPELLLogotipo LATINDEX Logotipo OPENAIRE Logotipo DOAJLogotipo Cengage Logotipo EBSCOLogotipo REDIB Logotipo ESCI