A Dimensional Analysis of the use of Performance Measurement Systems in Credit Cooperatives

Elizandra Severgnini, Edwin Vladimir Cardoza Galdamez, Valter Afonso Vieira, Salete Verginia Fontana Baiochi

Abstract


The appropriate use of organizational performance information influences anorganization´s results and capabilities. In the literature, there are four dimensions to the use of the performance measurement system (PMS) such as monitoring, attention focus, strategic decision-making, and legitimacy. Although the use of PMS is frequent in private enterprises, few studies have been concerned with analyzing the reasons and adequacies of PMS in credit cooperatives (CC). Thus, the paper’s main goal is to analyze the ways in which PMS is used and their respective objectives in CC. In field research, we investigate three cooperatives representing the largest organizations in Brazil. By means of a bibliometric study and qualitative inquiry with multiple companies (multiple cases), we interviewed their executives. The bibliometric study provided subsidies to propose a classification of PMS, as well as an analysis of similarities and divergences between the classifications presented in the literature. In the qualitative inquiry, four dimensions of PMS were observed and confirmed in the CC´s management. In addition, based on the interviews with the executives, two new dimensions of the PMS were proposed, such as Incentives, Rewards, and Human Valorization.

Keywords


use, performance measurement systems, credit cooperatives.

References


Aghion, B. A. (1999). On the design of a credit agreement with peer monitoring. Journal of development economics, 60(1), 79-104.

Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., & Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 25-37.

Bacen (2013). Ranking das maiores cooperativas de crédito brasileiras – base dez/2013. Disponível em http://cooperativismodecredito.coop.br/2014/03/ranking-das-maiores-cooperativas-de-credito-brasileiras-base-dez2013/. Capturado em 12 de janeiro de 2016.

Bacen (2015). FAQ Cooperativas de crédito. Disponível em http://www.bcb.gov.br/?cooperativasfaq, Capturado em 12 de janeiro de 2016.

Besley, T. (1995). Non market institutions for credit and risk sharing in low-income countries. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3), 115-127.

Boiral, O., & Henri, J. F. (2012). Modelling the impact of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: A comparative approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 99(30), 84-97.

Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J.,& Nahapiet, J. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1), 5-27.

Callado, A. A. C., Callado, A. L. C., & Chaves, R. P. (2015). Use of non-financial metrics and the role played by agribusiness companies within the supply chain structure. BASE-Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 12(3), 183-192.

Ceretta, P. S., & de Quadros, C. J. (2003). Implementação do Balanced Scorecard: um caso prático. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 9(4), 1-15.

Demartini, C., & Mella, P. (2014). Beyond feedback control: the interactive use of performance management systems. Implications for process innovation in Italian health care organizations. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 29(1), e1-e30.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

Feagin, J.R.; Orum, A.M.; & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A case for the case study. University of North Caroline Press Books.

Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 171-186.

Franco-Santos, M., Kennerley, M., Micheli, P., Martinez, V., Mason, S., Marr, B., & Neely, A. (2007). Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(8), 784-801.

Gimenes, R. M. T., & Gimenes, M. P. (2009). Limitações ao Processo de Auto financiamento do Capital de Giro em Cooperativas Agropecuárias Aplicações do Modelo Dinâmico de Análise Financeira. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 8(1) 1-15.

Hacker, M. E., & Brotherton, P. A. (1998). Designing and installing effective performance measurement systems. IIE Solutions, 30(8), 18-24.

Hansen, S. C., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2004). Multiple facets of budgeting: na exploratory analysis. Management Accounting Research, 15(4), 415-439.

Henri, J.F. & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63-80.

Henri, J.F. (2006). Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(1), 77-103.

Henri, J.F. (2010). The periodic review of performance indicators: an empirical investigation of the dynamism of performance measurement systems. European Accounting Review, 19(1), 73-96.

Henri, J.F.; Boiral, O., & Roy, M.J. (2014). The tracking of environmental costs: Motivations and impacts. European Accounting Review, 23(4), 647-669.

Henri, J.F.; Boiral, O., & Roy, M.J. (2015). Strategic cost management and performance: The case of environmental costs. The British Accounting Review, 48(2), 1-14.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1993). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review OnPoint Collection, 85(7), 35-48.

Kruse, N., Verbeeten, F. H., & Möller, K. (2015). Leadership style, performance measure use and innovation in research and development projects. Universitat Saint Gallen, Doctoral Dissertation.

Markus, M. L. & Pfeffer, J. (1983). Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2), 205-218.

McCunn, P. (1998). The balanced scorecard: the eleventh commandment, Management Accounting, 76(11), 34-36.

Neely, A. (1998). Measuring business performance: Why, what and how? The Economist Books. Profile Books Ltd, London.

Noor, K.B.M. (2008). Case study: A strategic research methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602-1604.

Queiroz, A. D. S., dos Reis, M. O.,& da Rocha, J. S. (2016). Decision Making Models in the Financial Market: A Study in the Light of Prospect Theory and Limited Rationality. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 19(2), 211-229.

Schaffer, U., Mahlendorf, M.D., Rehring, J. (2014) Does the Interactive Use of Headquarter Performance Measurement Systems in Foreign Subsidiaries End anger the Potential to Profit from Local Relationships? Australian Accounting Review, 68(24), Issue 1, 21-31.

Schneiderman, A. (1999). Why balanced scorecards fail. Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, special edition. 6-11.

Simon, H. A. et al. (1954). Centralization versus Decentralization in the Controller's Department. Carnegie Institute of Technology. Graduate School of Industrial Administration. Controllership Foundation, 106p.

Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New Perspectives, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1/2), 127-143.

Simons, R. (1994). How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal, Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 169-189.

Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control. Boston, MA. Harvard Business School Press.

Speklé, R.F.,Verbeeten, F.H.M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2),131-146.

Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511-521.

Vandenbosch, B. (1999). An empirical analysis of the association between the use of executive support systems and perceived organizational competitiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(1), 77-92.

van Veen-Dirks, P. (2010). Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 141-164

Vilela, J. R. D. P. X., Neto, A. C., Bernardes, P., & Cardoso, M. B. R. (2015). Governança e Relações de Poder: Orientando as Boas Práticas em Cooperativas e outras Sociedades de Pessoas. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 18(2) 1-15.

Warken, S. L., & Witte, G. F. (2009). Sistemas de informações gerenciais - caso Cotrijal. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 2(1), 1-15.

Weiss, R.S. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster, New York.

Yin, R. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th Edition. Sage Publications. California.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21714/1984-3925_2017v20n3a5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 1984-3925

Licença Creative Commons
The JAMG adopts the Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC ND Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 

Indexing and Abstracting:

Logotipo SPELLLogotipo LATINDEX Logotipo OPENAIRE Logotipo DOAJLogotipo Cengage Logotipo EBSCOLogotipo REDIB Logotipo ESCI